GRE写作备考提升细节注意事项汇总分析2020

GRE作文部分是很多考生的重点备考对象，其分数在GRE考试中也占有重要地位。在GRE作文练习中大家都应该注意哪些事项?怎样才能顺利备考提升水平和得分?下面小编就和大家分享GRE写作备考提升细节注意事项汇总分析，来欣赏一下吧。

GRE写作备考提升细节注意事项汇总分析

新GRE作文练习有多重要

大家都知道新GRE写作很重要，但对于具体考到多少分才够可能更多还是跟自己申请学校和专业的要求挂钩。实际上，新GRE作文对于GRE考试，就好比GRE考试对于申请的重要程度。简单来说，如果申请学校要求GRE成绩的话，首先肯定要看要求底线，比如数学要求150分，语文要求150之类的明线要求，达不到就没有商量余地。但GRE写作和这两部分不一样，是有商量余地的。然后分数底线达到了之后就是看优势了。这个时候GRE写作如果能达到满分或5.5，在申请中绝对是亮点，作用就比语文数学的高分重要很多了。

所以，GRE写作的练习可以不追求高分，只要能上4-5分对于大多数学校来讲都足够。但如果能达到5.5/6分，则能发挥很大作用。因此，要不就不太重视，要不就重视到底。GRE作文高分能很大程度上左右你申请的成功率。

新GRE作文分数

ETS官方虽然给出了GRE作文的评分标准，但其实这个标准非常模棱两可，往往看了之后也不知道怎么样是adequate，怎么样是strong甚至outstanding。因此给大家一个更简易的标准，帮助大家理清方向：

首先需要明确的是，2分，一般正常人是写不到那么低的。3分基本就是逻辑不是很清晰，语言丝毫没有亮点，简单的说就是要什么没什么，没有值得给分的地方，最后就只能给3分了。而4分以上就可以用字数约定下了，Issue的话分别是450,550,650+，Argument则400,500,600+，分别对应4分，5分，6分。当然虽然说是字数约定，绝对不是让大家拼命凑字数，那样就失去了用字数测定的意义。这样的字数是有很高的科学性的，在30分钟内想阐述明白自己的观点，在没有废话的情况下，至少也要达到这些字数才能达到基本的要求。

新GRE作文练习强度要求

上文提到过新GRE作文的练习，由于大家真的很难界定自己到底能不能避免倒霉的3分，所以建议大家还是保持重视写作的态度比较好，备考期间至少要保持每天都要练习1-2篇的强度。

GRE写作高分范文：知识让事情变得神秘

As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and more mysterious.

当我们获得越来越多的知识，事情并没有变的更加透彻，相反是变的更复杂更神秘。

GRE写作范文：

With the development of the society, natural science and social science help people learn more about the world and the things seems to be clear, actually, under some circumstance, in-depth researches on things cause three consequences at the some time: comprehensible, complex and mysterious rather than merely understand.

Accumulated knowledge helps problems or theories to be expressed clearly and lucidly so that people feel easy to understand the issues. For example, Galileo, who was a famous Italian astronomer who despise the prejudices and book learning of the Aristotelians, who put his question to the nature instead of the ancient, and who drew his conclusion fearlessly. Eventually, his experiment and observation established a new theory and overthrew the old one from Aristotle. Because of his success and theories,people learn how to observe the sky with telescope and begin to understand another space, which is far from the earth. Obviously, without knowledge from Galileo’s theory, universe might also be a inspiration and even a vacancy. Take another scientist for example, Edison, who invented electric bulb by making thousand experiment and brought the society into a brilliant century. Recently, people live in a society which full of light and help them to learn what they can see and observe. With the revolution of human beings, knowledge solves various problems and creates a more comprehensible and comfortable life to the people.

However, those knowledge makes us to considered the reason and origin for human nature of curiosity, as a result, the world become increasingly complex. Take the same instance what have pointed above, although people learn to use telescope to observe the sky, people unsatisfied with such a "observation" and desire to touch with the outer space and understand other planets. In this case, scientists invented the spacecraft which have successfully landed on the Moon and Mars, after these experiments, people know that there are no water and few gravitation in Moon, and the Mas might have the similar condition of the earth. however, the complex problems come out, because people feel difficulty to explain the phenomena in the outer space.

Therefore, the research on astronomy becomes complex and involved. Not only this field, but also all scientific area becomes complicate. When people understand a surface of things, they will feel anxious to learn the core of them, however, the deeper people do researches, the more complications exist.

Additionally, in-depth learning causes desire of researching for mystery, which follows the existence of complication. Indeed, there are many uncanny problems in process of doing research when people hope to point out the reason of complex issue. For example, the construction of pyramid has been an enigma for a long time, because people fail to imagine that the ancient people can construct such a palatial with old and traditional method. Moreover, "black hole" would be a mysterious place that astronomers desire to touch and understand because no one know a little about this untouched field. Faced with these things, human nature motivates and stimulates people to purchase the reason and the secret.

In sum, people learn more about things by accumulating knowledge and then establish new theory and system, and at the same time, complex and mysterious problems exist simultaneously for the desire of exploring secret and untouched field-all of these constitute a process of learning and researching.

GRE写作高分范文：政治的统一与分歧

The goal of politics should not be the pursuit of an ideal, but rather the search for common ground and reasonable consensus.

政治的目的不应该是追求一种理想，而是寻求共同点和合理的一致。

GRE写作范文：

I safely agree with the speaker's argument that the search for common ground and reasonable consensus is the goal of politics. But I am reserved to support his or her idea that the goal of politics should not be the pursuit of an ideal. The pursuit of an ideal is not doomed to conflict with the search for consensus.

Politics, as it was defined is an art of balancing, that is to keep subtle balance between different parties, which represent vested interests of different groups, hold different ideologies, to harmonize disparate social organization such as Green peace organization and Arms manufacture association, to concert different development plan and the like. Various interests of different groups intertwined together, forming a huge net. It is this net that restrains any individual part's self-intention and possible partial proposal, makes the leaders think over before leap. In this way, the policy making would be more stable and reasonable, meanwhile the majority’s interests could be taken care of. A convincing example in this point is the nomination of the candidate of President in certain party. One must be selected from tens of candidates who are on the behalf of different groups. At first, every group may name his own representatives,but the winner is single. After seeing his nomination is not supported by the majority,thus has no chance to win, they will compromise on the premise that their core interests are ensured, select the one who can be accepted by most groups if not all to reach reasonable consensus, This interacting relation is the fundament of democracy, which marks a country's civilization degree and propel the society to forge ahead.

When it comes to another point of the speaker’s argument, namely the goal of politics should not be the pursuit of an ideal; my attitude sharply varies between different explanations and comprehensions on the key word- ideal. If ideal was defined as impractical ideas- castle in the air, of course, it should not be the base for the policy-making. The leader with hollow ideal may lead his people to abyss, such as the former Iraq president ‘s dream of his “Arab empire”. However, if the ideal was defined as certain ground and reasonable ambition, it could even be argued that the very difference between politician and statesman comes from the pursuit of ideal. Politicians do with the ideal, statesman without. The most brilliant politicians in the history are those who are harboring holy but ground ideals, cherish their ideals as the source of commitment.

In a sum, politics has its specific trait, once an individual steps on the power stage; he (or she) will greatly influence the rest of people, and his (or her) decision impacting the interests of various groups are unavoidable to be the result of compromise, a wiser politician will pursuit their reasonable ideals and move ahead on the process of compromise.